Loading dashboard
Experiments tailored to you
See what actually works for you. Connect your health data and track your progress.
No added sugars from labels, drinks, or obvious sources, where removing fast-absorbing sugar that carries little fullness cuts calorie load and gives insulin less to clear.
A label-defined no-added-sugar experiment can test whether replacing recurring added-sugar sources changes downstream home markers while preserving adequate nutrition; it should not promise weight loss, glucose improvement, dental reversal, disease prevention, or a taste reset.
Best read as a practical sugar-source substitution experiment: intake logs confirm the exposure changed, while weight, waist, and morning blood pressure are the most measurable downstream signals; glucose, lipids, dental outcomes, cravings, taste, and long-term disease outcomes remain mixed, adjacent, or context-only.
The corpus combines free-sugar guidance, sugar-sweetened-beverage trials, clinical NAFLD and dental studies, sweetener-substitution studies, observational cohorts, safety-only sources, and external guidelines. These should not be collapsed into one direct adult efficacy claim.
Sources checked is every card shown on this page. Direct human participants counts only primary human studies with coded participant totals, deduplicated by cohort when possible. Review cards may show larger pooled head counts on their own rows, and those pooled totals are treated as approximate rather than added into the page-level number.
This bucket should anchor the implementation section. FDA label guidance supports using the Added Sugars line for packaged foods, while WHO/SACN/CDC sources give threshold and definition context that must not be collapsed into one exposure. The closest adult RCT evidence shows that free-sugar-reduction recommendations can reduce intake over 12 weeks, but implementation support evidence is mostly feasibility, qualitative, content-analysis, or clinical-supervised context. Plain-language takeaway: make the protocol practical—labels, source tracking, planning, self-monitoring, and substitutions—without claiming every tactic is independently proven.
14 sources · 6 supporting sources · 4 trials · 3 guidance sources
Added Sugars on the Nutrition Facts Label is appraised for the Dose, labels, and implementation supports evidence group.
Guideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children is appraised for the Dose, labels, and implementation supports evidence group.
Get the Facts: Added Sugars is appraised for the Dose, labels, and implementation supports evidence group.
SACN Carbohydrates and Health Report is appraised for the Dose, labels, and implementation supports evidence group.
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025-2030 is appraised for the Dose, labels, and implementation supports evidence group.
Effects of dietary recommendations for reducing free sugar intakes, on free sugar intakes, dietary profiles and anthropometry: a randomised controlled trial is appraised for the Dose, labels, and implementation supports evidence group.
Protocol: The effects of nutrient- vs food- vs food-substitution-based dietary recommendations for reducing free sugar intakes, on free sugar intakes, dietary profiles and sweet taste outcomes: A randomised controlled trial is appraised for the Dose, labels, and implementation supports evidence group.
Sugar Habit Hacker: Initial evidence that a planning intervention reduces sugar intake is appraised for the Dose, labels, and implementation supports evidence group.
I was truly addicted to sugar: A consumer-focused classification system of behaviour change strategies for sugar reduction is appraised for the Dose, labels, and implementation supports evidence group.
Components in downstream health promotions to reduce sugar intake among adults: a systematic review is appraised for the Dose, labels, and implementation supports evidence group.
Sweet Talk: A Qualitative Study Exploring Attitudes towards Sugar, Sweeteners and Sweet-Tasting Foods in the United Kingdom is appraised for the Dose, labels, and implementation supports evidence group.
Effect of a story-based, animated video to reduce added sugar consumption: A web-based randomized controlled trial is appraised for the Dose, labels, and implementation supports evidence group.
Social Network Intervention Reduces Added Sugar Intake Among Baltimore Public Housing Residents: A Feasibility Study is appraised for the Dose, labels, and implementation supports evidence group.
A Qualitative Study to Understand the Potential Efficacy of an Information-Based Sugar Reduction Intervention among Low Socioeconomic Individuals in the UK is appraised for the Dose, labels, and implementation supports evidence group.
This bucket keeps substitution advice useful but bounded. SSB-reduction, fruit-juice, and beverage-replacement evidence suggests drinks can be a high-leverage first target, especially when sugar intake is concentrated in beverages, but most evidence is beverage-only, pediatric, workplace, or otherwise adjacent. Low/no-calorie sweeteners can help when directly replacing sugar or SSBs, yet results vary by comparator, water sometimes performs similarly or better, and long-term safety signals remain uncertain. Plain-language takeaway: lead with water or noncaloric beverage replacement for SSBs; log juice and sweeteners as substitutions, not proof that the whole protocol works.
17 sources · 9 reviews · 6 trials · 1 observational study
Effects of decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption on body weight in adolescents: a randomized, controlled pilot study is appraised for the Beverage and sweetener substitutions evidence group.
A randomized trial of sugar-sweetened beverages and adolescent body weight is appraised for the Beverage and sweetener substitutions evidence group.
Effects of a behavioral and health literacy intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages: a randomized-controlled trial is appraised for the Beverage and sweetener substitutions evidence group.
Dietary quality changes in response to a sugar-sweetened beverage-reduction intervention: results from the Talking Health randomized controlled clinical trial is appraised for the Beverage and sweetener substitutions evidence group.
Interventions to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages or increase water intake: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis is appraised for the Beverage and sweetener substitutions evidence group.
Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health is appraised for the Beverage and sweetener substitutions evidence group.
Controlled trial of a workplace sales ban on sugar-sweetened beverages is appraised for the Beverage and sweetener substitutions evidence group.
Low-Calorie Sweetened Beverages and Cardiometabolic Health: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association is appraised for the Beverage and sweetener substitutions evidence group.
Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies is appraised for the Beverage and sweetener substitutions evidence group.
The effects of low-calorie sweeteners on energy intake and body weight: a systematic review and meta-analyses of sustained intervention studies is appraised for the Beverage and sweetener substitutions evidence group.
Association of Low- and No-Calorie Sweetened Beverages as a Replacement for Sugar-Sweetened Beverages With Body Weight and Cardiometabolic Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis is appraised for the Beverage and sweetener substitutions evidence group.
Association between intake of non-sugar sweeteners and health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and observational studies is appraised for the Beverage and sweetener substitutions evidence group.
Artificial sweeteners and risk of cardiovascular diseases: results from the prospective NutriNet-Santé cohort is appraised for the Beverage and sweetener substitutions evidence group.
Non-nutritive sweetened beverages versus water after a 52-week weight loss and weight maintenance programme: a randomised controlled trial is appraised for the Beverage and sweetener substitutions evidence group.
Fruit juice glucose-control meta-analysis is appraised for the Beverage and sweetener substitutions evidence group.
Low-calorie sweeteners and body-weight meta-analysis is appraised for the Beverage and sweetener substitutions evidence group.
Beverage-alternative substitution review is appraised for the Beverage and sweetener substitutions evidence group.
This bucket covers the practical supports that make a no-added-sugar attempt more than a rule: simple recommendations, goal setting, action and coping plans, self-monitoring, coaching, app/logging, label reading, craving/lapse checks, and follow-up. The evidence supports using these as implementation aids, but most sources are context-only, uncontrolled, short, clinical, or heterogeneous. Plain-language takeaway: track sources, snacks, cravings, symptoms, lapses, and substitutions; do not imply that adherence support proves the diet’s metabolic effect.
13 sources · 7 trials · 4 supporting sources · 2 reviews
Effects of dietary recommendations for reducing free sugar intakes, on free sugar intakes, dietary profiles and anthropometry: a randomised controlled trial is appraised for the Adherence support and tracking evidence group.
Protocol: The effects of nutrient- vs food- vs food-substitution-based dietary recommendations for reducing free sugar intakes, on free sugar intakes, dietary profiles and sweet taste outcomes: A randomised controlled trial is appraised for the Adherence support and tracking evidence group.
Sugar Habit Hacker: Initial evidence that a planning intervention reduces sugar intake is appraised for the Adherence support and tracking evidence group.
Effectiveness of nutrition counseling on reducing sugar intake amount and frequency: A randomized clinical trial is appraised for the Adherence support and tracking evidence group.
Ecological momentary assessment of symptom trajectories during sugar reduction: application of substance use disorder criteria is appraised for the Adherence support and tracking evidence group.
Effect of AHA dietary counselling on added sugar intake among participants with metabolic syndrome is appraised for the Adherence support and tracking evidence group.
Social Network Intervention Reduces Added Sugar Intake Among Baltimore Public Housing Residents: A Feasibility Study is appraised for the Adherence support and tracking evidence group.
Interventions to enhance adherence to dietary advice for preventing and managing chronic diseases in adults is appraised for the Adherence support and tracking evidence group.
I was truly addicted to sugar: A consumer-focused classification system of behaviour change strategies for sugar reduction is appraised for the Adherence support and tracking evidence group.
Sweet Talk: A Qualitative Study Exploring Attitudes towards Sugar, Sweeteners and Sweet-Tasting Foods in the United Kingdom is appraised for the Adherence support and tracking evidence group.
Effect of a story-based, animated video to reduce added sugar consumption: A web-based randomized controlled trial is appraised for the Adherence support and tracking evidence group.
Components in downstream health promotions to reduce sugar intake among adults: a systematic review is appraised for the Adherence support and tracking evidence group.
Computerized neurocognitive training for improving dietary health and facilitating weight loss is appraised for the Adherence support and tracking evidence group.
This bucket is useful for implementation ideas—home delivery or replacement drinks, health-literacy counseling, digital prompts, motivational add-ons, workplace access changes, school/caregiver programs, and water or low/no-calorie beverage substitution—but it is not whole-diet no-added-sugar evidence. Plain-language takeaway: beverage changes are often the easiest first adherence target, but keep them labeled as beverage-specific.
17 sources · 12 trials · 4 reviews · 1 observational study
Effects of decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption on body weight in adolescents: a randomized, controlled pilot study is appraised for the Adjacent beverage behavior supports evidence group.
A randomized trial of sugar-sweetened beverages and adolescent body weight is appraised for the Adjacent beverage behavior supports evidence group.
Substituting water for sugar-sweetened beverages reduces circulating triglycerides and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in obese but not in overweight Mexican women in a randomized controlled trial is appraised for the Adjacent beverage behavior supports evidence group.
Effects of a behavioral and health literacy intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages: a randomized-controlled trial is appraised for the Adjacent beverage behavior supports evidence group.
Dietary quality changes in response to a sugar-sweetened beverage-reduction intervention: results from the Talking Health randomized controlled clinical trial is appraised for the Adjacent beverage behavior supports evidence group.
A mHealth randomized controlled trial to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage intake in preschool-aged children is appraised for the Adjacent beverage behavior supports evidence group.
A Brief Motivational Intervention Differentially Reduces Sugar-sweetened Beverage (SSB) Consumption is appraised for the Adjacent beverage behavior supports evidence group.
Controlled trial of a workplace sales ban on sugar-sweetened beverages is appraised for the Adjacent beverage behavior supports evidence group.
Kids SIPsmartER reduces sugar-sweetened beverages among Appalachian middle-school students and their caregivers: a cluster randomized controlled trial is appraised for the Adjacent beverage behavior supports evidence group.
Maintenance of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Behaviors Among Adolescents and Their Caregivers: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial is appraised for the Adjacent beverage behavior supports evidence group.
A digital behavioral intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage consumption: a randomized, controlled trial is appraised for the Adjacent beverage behavior supports evidence group.
Interventions to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages or increase water intake: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis is appraised for the Adjacent beverage behavior supports evidence group.
Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health is appraised for the Adjacent beverage behavior supports evidence group.
Effects of Sugar-Sweetened, Artificially Sweetened, and Unsweetened Beverages on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Body Composition and Sweet Taste Preference: A Randomized Controlled Trial is appraised for the Adjacent beverage behavior supports evidence group.
Association of Low- and No-Calorie Sweetened Beverages as a Replacement for Sugar-Sweetened Beverages With Body Weight and Cardiometabolic Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis is appraised for the Adjacent beverage behavior supports evidence group.
Relation of Change or Substitution of Low- and No-Calorie Sweetened Beverages With Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies is appraised for the Adjacent beverage behavior supports evidence group.
Artificial sweeteners and risk of cardiovascular diseases: results from the prospective NutriNet-Santé cohort is appraised for the Adjacent beverage behavior supports evidence group.
This bucket sets the boundary between a lightweight adult self-experiment and highly supported clinical, pediatric, or caregiver interventions. Some studies used food provision, bottled water, grocery support, dietitian-guided shopping, motivational interviewing, all-food-provided feeding, or caregiver education. Plain-language takeaway: those models can inspire support design, but they should not set expectations for unsupervised adult adherence.
6 sources · 3 trials · 2 supporting sources · 1 observational study
Effect of a Low Free Sugar Diet vs Usual Diet on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Adolescent Boys: A Randomized Clinical Trial is appraised for the High-support clinical and caregiver boundary evidence group.
Clinical Intervention to Reduce Dietary Sugar Does Not Affect Liver Fat in Latino Youth, Regardless of PNPLA3 Genotype: A Randomized Controlled Trial is appraised for the High-support clinical and caregiver boundary evidence group.
Study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial using a novel, family-centered diet treatment to prevent nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Hispanic children is appraised for the High-support clinical and caregiver boundary evidence group.
Low-added sugar dietary intervention study to mitigate glucose intolerance and improve body composition in adults with cystic fibrosis: a protocol of a double-blind, randomised study is appraised for the High-support clinical and caregiver boundary evidence group.
Exposure to low-sweet snacks and caregiver nutritional and dental health education lowered children’s added sugar intake: A randomized controlled trial is appraised for the High-support clinical and caregiver boundary evidence group.
Pediatric obesity-clinic sugar counseling chart review is appraised for the High-support clinical and caregiver boundary evidence group.
The closest intervention evidence did not surface clear study-related adverse events in extracted notes from a small supervised adolescent NAFLD low-free-sugar trial and an adolescent SSB-reduction RCT, but the broader safety evidence is mostly protocol-only, clinical-supervised, or adjacent. Plain-language takeaway: use monitoring language, not a blanket safety promise.
6 sources · 3 trials · 3 supporting sources
Effect of a Low Free Sugar Diet vs Usual Diet on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Adolescent Boys: A Randomized Clinical Trial is appraised for the Direct safety evidence and monitoring evidence group.
A randomized trial of sugar-sweetened beverages and adolescent body weight is appraised for the Direct safety evidence and monitoring evidence group.
Protocol: The effects of nutrient- vs food- vs food-substitution-based dietary recommendations for reducing free sugar intakes, on free sugar intakes, dietary profiles and sweet taste outcomes: A randomised controlled trial is appraised for the Direct safety evidence and monitoring evidence group.
Study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial using a novel, family-centered diet treatment to prevent nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Hispanic children is appraised for the Direct safety evidence and monitoring evidence group.
Low-added sugar dietary intervention study to mitigate glucose intolerance and improve body composition in adults with cystic fibrosis: a protocol of a double-blind, randomised study is appraised for the Direct safety evidence and monitoring evidence group.
Intermittent fasting and a no-sugar diet for Long COVID symptoms: a randomized crossover trial is appraised for the Direct safety evidence and monitoring evidence group.
This bucket covers the groups where a self-guided no-added-sugar rule can become the wrong intervention: diabetes or glucose-lowering medication use, pregnancy, children, high-training athletes, frail or undernourished older adults, hospitalized or malnutrition-risk users, and eating-disorder or orthorexia-risk users. Plain-language takeaway: the protocol should preserve adequate food, carbohydrates, hydration, and flexibility, and should route higher-risk users to clinician-guided adaptation.
25 sources · 11 guidance sources · 7 reviews · 5 observational studies
Dietary Advice For Individuals with Diabetes is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Nutrition Therapy for Adults With Diabetes or Prediabetes: A Consensus Report is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Adapting Medication for Type 2 Diabetes to a Low Carbohydrate Diet is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026 is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Healthy Eating During Pregnancy is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Added Sugars and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Children: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutrient timing is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Considerations of Low Carbohydrate Availability (LCA) to Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S) in Female Endurance Athletes: A Narrative Review is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Position of the American Dietetic Association: liberalized diets for older adults in long-term care is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Management of eating disorders for people with higher weight: clinical practice guideline is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
A consensus document on definition and diagnostic criteria for orthorexia nervosa is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Orthorexia boundary literature is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Pregnancy gestational-weight-gain cohort is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Maternal sugar intake and offspring atopy cohort is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
US pregnancy added-sugar intake surveillance is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Prenatal and child sugar intake cognition cohort is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Pregnancy sugar and alternative-sweetener review is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Sugary food consumption in pregnancy review is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Added sugar intake during pregnancy mechanistic cohort is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Pregnancy sugar intake and offspring allergy meta-analysis is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
ESPEN hospital nutrition guideline is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Dietary sugars upper-intake risk assessment is appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
ADA positive health behaviors standards are appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Dietary restrictions in malnourished nursing-home patients are appraised for the Special-population safety boundaries evidence group.
Low/no-calorie sweeteners, sugar alcohols, keto, low-carbohydrate diets, and fasting are adjacent strategies with separate evidence and separate safety questions. Plain-language takeaway: water-first and minimally processed substitutions are simpler; sweeteners may be logged as optional transition tools, but they should not be promoted as the required or proven-safe replacement strategy.
18 sources · 7 reviews · 3 physiology studies · 3 trials
Use of non-sugar sweeteners: WHO guideline is appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
Health effects of the use of non-sugar sweeteners: a systematic review and meta-analysis is appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
Association between intake of non-sugar sweeteners and health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and observational studies is appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
Personalized microbiome-driven effects of non-nutritive sweeteners on human glucose tolerance is appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
The artificial sweetener erythritol and cardiovascular event risk is appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
Xylitol is prothrombotic and associated with cardiovascular risk is appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
Artificial sweeteners and risk of cardiovascular diseases: results from the prospective NutriNet-Santé cohort is appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
Ketogenic diet but not free-sugar restriction alters glucose tolerance, lipid metabolism, peripheral tissue phenotype, and gut microbiome: RCT is appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
A Case of Hypoglycemia Associated With the Ketogenic Diet and Alcohol Use is appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
Intermittent fasting and a no-sugar diet for Long COVID symptoms: a randomized crossover trial is appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
Sweetened beverage intake and hypertension cohorts are appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
Soft-drink and diabetes dose-response meta-analysis is appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
Sugary and artificially sweetened beverage change cohorts are appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
Sugar and artificially sweetened beverage risk meta-analysis is appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
Low-carbohydrate diets for type 2 diabetes remission review is appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
Short-term sugar or carbohydrate restriction crossover study is appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
Carbohydrate restriction in type 1 diabetes review is appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
Low-carbohydrate diets for type 1 diabetes review is appraised for the Sweetener and adjacent-diet safety boundaries evidence group.
This bucket keeps the protocol measurable without overpromising. Added-sugar intake is the exposure-fidelity check, using label Added Sugars plus food logs or recalls while keeping added sugar separate from free sugar and total sugar. Weight, waist, and morning blood pressure are the most practical downstream home signals; glucose, HbA1c/CGM, lipids, dental markers, cravings, lapses, and taste preference remain exploratory or context outcomes because the direct evidence is mixed and often clinical, pediatric, short-term, beverage-specific, or observational.
28 sources · 12 reviews · 6 trials · 5 observational studies
Added Sugars on the Nutrition Facts Label is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Guideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Components in downstream health promotions to reduce sugar intake among adults: a systematic review is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Effects of dietary recommendations for reducing free sugar intakes, on free sugar intakes, dietary profiles and anthropometry: a randomised controlled trial is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Effects of reducing free sugars on 24-hour glucose profiles and glycemic variability in subjects without diabetes is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Dietary sugars and cardiometabolic risk: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of the effects on blood pressure and lipids is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
High versus low-added sugar consumption for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Effect on caries of restricting sugars intake: systematic review to inform WHO guidelines is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Systematic Review of the Effect on Caries of Sugars Intake: Ten-Year Update is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Effects of a 4-week free-sugar avoidance during periodontal therapy: An explorative randomized controlled clinical trial is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Sugar Habit Hacker: Initial evidence that a planning intervention reduces sugar intake is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Ecological momentary assessment of symptom trajectories during sugar reduction: application of substance use disorder criteria is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Reduced dietary intake of simple sugars alters perceived sweet taste intensity but not perceived pleasantness is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Effects of a six-day, whole-diet sweet taste intervention on pleasantness, desire for and intakes of sweet foods: a randomised controlled trial is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
The Sweet Tooth Trial: A Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Effects of A 6-Month Low, Regular, or High Dietary Sweet Taste Exposure on Sweet Taste Liking, and Various Outcomes Related to Food Intake and Weight Status is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Added sugar intake and cardiovascular diseases mortality among US adults is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Dietary sugar consumption and health: umbrella review is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Dietary Sugar Intake and Incident Type 2 Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Added Sugars Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Free sugars and dental caries narrative review is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
REGARDS sugary beverage mortality analysis is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Older-adult added-sugar and body-weight cohort is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Adult NAFLD low-free-sugar randomized trial is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Added sugar and mortality cohort review is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Sugar subtypes and mortality dose-response review is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
CARDIA added-sugar and long-term weight-gain cohort is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.
Added sugar and cardiovascular disease incidence cohort is appraised for the Outcome monitoring and measurement evidence group.